Events and Hooks — WirePlumber 0.5.7 documentation

# Events and Hooks

Session management is all about reacting to events and taking neccessary actions. This is why WirePlumber’s logic is all built on events and hooks.

## Events

Events are objects that represent a change that has just happened on a PipeWire object, or just a trigger for making a decision and potentially taking some action.

Every event has a source, a subject and some properties, which include the event type.

- The `source` is a reference to the GObject that created this event. Typically, this is the `WpStandardEventSource` plugin.

- The `subject` is an optional reference to the object that this event is about. For example, in a `node-added` event, the `subject` would be a reference to the `WpNode` object that was just added. Some events, especially those which are used only to trigger actions, do not have a subject.

- The `properties` is a dictionary that contains information about the event, including the event type, and also includes all the PipeWire properties of the `subject`, if there is one.

- The `event.type` property describes the nature of the event, for example `node-added` or `metadata-changed` are some valid event types.

Every event also has a priority. Events with a higher priority are processed before events with a lower priority. When two or more events have the same priority, they are processed in a first-in-first-out manner. This logic is defined in the event dispatcher.

Events are short-lived objects. They are created at the time that something is happening and they are destroyed after they get processed. Processing an event means executing all the hooks that are associated with it. The next section explains what hooks are and how they are associated with events.

## Hooks

Hooks are objects that represent a runnable action that needs to be executed when a certain event is processed. Every hook, therefore, consists of a function - synchronous or asynchronous - that can be executed. Additionally, every hook has a means to associate itself with specific events. This is normally done by declaring interest to specific event properties or combinations of them.

There are two main types of hooks: `SimpleEventHook` and `AsyncEventHook`.

- `SimpleEventHook` contains a single, synchronous function. As soon as this function is executed, the hook is completed.

- `AsyncEventHook` contains multiple functions, combined together in a state machine using `WpTransition` underneath. The hook is completed only after the state machine reaches its final state and this can take any amount of time neccessary.

Every hook also has a name, which can be an arbitrary string of characters. Additionally, it has two arrays of names, which declare dependencies between this hook and others. One array is called `before` and the other is called `after`. The hook names in the `before` array specify that this hook must be executed before those other hooks. Similarly, the hook names in the `after` array specify that this hook must be executed after those other hooks. Using this mechanism, it is possible to define the order in which hooks will be executed, for a specific event.

Hooks are long-lived objects. They are created once, registered in the event dispatcher, they are attached on events and detached after their execution. They don’t maintain any internal state, so the actions of the hook depend solely on the event itself.

## The Event Dispatcher

The event dispatcher is a (per core) singleton object that processes all events and also maintains a list of all the registered hooks. It has a method to push events on it, which causes them to be scheduled for processing.

## Scheduling of events and hooks

The main idea and reasoning behind this architecture is to have everything execute in a predefined order and always wait for an action to finish before executing the next one.

Every event has a priority and every hook also has an order of execution that derives from the inter-dependencies between hooks, which are defined with `before` and `after` (see above). When an event is pushed on the dispatcher, the dispatcher goes through all the registered hooks and checks which hooks are configured to run on this event (their event interest matches the event). It then makes a list of them, sorted by their order of execution, and stores it on the event. The event is then added on the dispatcher’s list of events, which is sorted by priority.

For example:

    List of events
     |  event1 (prio 99) -> hook1, hook2, hook3
     |  event2 (prio 50) -> hook5, hook2, hook4
     v

The dispatcher has an internal `GSource` that is registered with `G_PRIORITY_HIGH_IDLE` priority. When there is at least one event in the list of events, the source is dispatched. Every time it gets dispatched, it takes the top-most event (the highest priority one) and executes the highest priority hook in that event. If the hook executes synchronously, it then takes the next hook and continues until there are no more hooks on this event; then it goes to the next event, and so on. If the hook, however, executes asynchronously, processing stops until the hook finishes; after finishing, processing resumes like before.

It is important to notice here that the list of events may be modified while events are getting processed. For example, a device is added; that’s a `device-added` event. Then a hook is executed to set the profile. That creates nodes, so a couple of `node-added` events… But there is also another hook to set the route, which was attached on the `device-added` event for the device. Suppose that we give the `node-added` events lower priority than the `device-added` events, then the `set-route` hook will execute right after the `set-profile` and before any `node-added` events are processed.

Visually, with sample priorities:

    List of events
     |  "device-added" (prio 20) -> set-profile, set-route
     |  "node-added" (prio 10) -> restore-stream, create-session-item
     v

Obviously, there can also be a case where a newly added event has higher priority than the event that was being processed before. In that case, processing the hooks of the original event is stopped until all the hooks from the higher priority event have been processed. For example, a capture stream node being added may trigger the “bluetooth autoswitch” hook, which will then change the profile of a device. Changing the profile also has to trigger setting a new route and also handling the new device nodes, creating session items for them… After all this is done, processing the original capture stream `node-added` event can continue.