aurupdater

notion3

Build times (auto-updated)


2026-09-10/11: filled in the rest of arch=(), then fixed the doc-build blocker properly

arch=() already listed all 7 archs, but only x86_64 had ever published. Built the other 6: armv7h succeeded outright; aarch64 failed once on transient archlinuxarm.org mirror flakiness (truncated downloads, DNS timeouts) and succeeded on a plain retry; pentium4/i686/i486 all failed identically on /usr/bin/ebb/extractbb exists in both 'texlive-bin' and 'texlive-basic'; armv6h failed differently, error: target not found: texlive-meta (not even present there). No pkgrel bump for any of this – purely additive new-arch builds, nothing already- published touched (see memory/PKGREL_VS_PKGVER.md’s “purely- additive arch=() edit” section, confirmed with the user the same session on a different package).

Root cause of the texlive failures, investigated on request: both texlive-bin (2026.0-2) and texlive-basic (2026.1-1) come from extra – upstream Arch32’s own repo, not archlinuxaba – and texlive-bin is a full point-version behind texlive-basic. Classic packaging-split lag: texlive-bin hasn’t been rebuilt to match texlive-basic’s newer file split yet, so both still ship the same two binaries. Not something this project can fix (upstream Arch32 package, not ours) or work around locally. armv6h’s texlive-meta absence is a related but separate symptom – that arch’s extra doesn’t carry the full texlive suite at all.

Fix: rubber/latex2html/texlive-meta are only needed for a separate notion-doc git source that builds the HTML manual – the actual window-manager build/install never touches them. Made doc building arch-conditional instead of an all-or-nothing removal (the user specifically asked for this, correctly – docs build fine on x86_64/armv7h/aarch64, no reason to drop them there):